Robotic Simulation in Urologic Surgery.

Robotic surgery continues to revolutionize the field of urologic surgery, and thus it is crucial that graduating urologic surgery residents demonstrate proficiency with this technology. The large learning curve of utilizing robotic technology limits resident immediate participation in real-life robotic surgery, and skill acquisition is further challenged by variable case volume. Robotic simulation offers an invaluable opportunity for urologic trainees to cultivate strong foundational skills in a non-clinical setting, ultimately leading to both competence and operative confidence. Several different simulation technologies and robotic assessment protocols have been developed and demonstrate validity in several domains. However, despite their demonstrable utility, there is no formal robotic curricula within US urologic surgery residencies. In this article, we will review the current state of robotic simulation training in urologic surgery and highlight the importance of its widespread utilization in urologic surgery residency training programs.

Current exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery faculty during urology residency.

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary US resident exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) faculty during urology residency is unknown. METHODS: Accredited US urology residencies were identified through the American Urological Association (AUA). Accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowships were identified through the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. The number of faculty and residency positions were obtained from program AUA profiles if they were last modified within the current application cycle; this information was obtained from program websites if AUA profiles were outdated. Data on faculty fellowship training was manually extracted from program websites. A quality control cross-check of program and faculty training characteristics was performed through direct communication with 5% of programs. RESULTS: Of 139 accredited residency programs assessed, 10.8% were affiliated with an accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowship. In total, 29.5% of residency programs, representing 25% of US urology residents, had neither a FPMRS fellowship nor any FPMRS certified faculty. The national FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:10.8, and 7.4% of faculty at all residency programs were FPMRS certified. In comparison, faculty-to-resident ratios for other subspecialties were: 1:4.7 for pediatrics, 1:3.6 for oncology, 1:5.9 for minimally invasive surgery/endourology, 1:14.2 for trauma/reconstruction, and 1:11.8 for andrology or male sexual/reproductive health. The FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:5.1 in programs with a urology-based FPMRS fellowship compared with 1:13.4 in programs without a FPMRS fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: 30% of US urology residency programs lack FPMRS trained faculty. Even when FPMRS faculty are on staff, the field is often underrepresented relative to other urologic subspecialties. Further studies are required to ascertain if inadequate exposure to FPMRS cases and mentors during training contribute to the shortage of urology residents who choose to specialize in FPMRS. This link has important implications for the current shortage of FPMRS providers.

Ticket to perform: an explorative study of trainees' engagement in and transfer of surgical training.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that simulation-based surgical skills training translates into improved operating room performance. Previous studies have predominantly focused on training methods and design and subsequent assessable performances and outcomes in the operating room, which only covers some aspects of training engagement and transfer of training. The purpose of this qualitative study was to contribute to the existing body of literature by exploring characteristics of first-year trainees' engagement in and perceptions of transfer of surgical skills training. METHODS: We conducted an explorative study based on individual interviews with first-year trainees in General Surgery, Urology, and Gynaecology and Obstetrics who participated in a laparoscopic skills training program. Informants were interviewed during and two months after the training program. A thematic cross-case analysis was conducted using systematic text condensation. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 informants, which produced 24 transcripts for analysis. We identified four main themes: (1) sportification of training, (2) modes of orientation, (3) transferrable skills, and (4) transfer opportunities. Informants described their surgical training using sports analogies of competition, timing, and step-by-step approaches. Visual orientations, kinaesthetic experiences, and elicited dialogues characterised training processes and engagement. These characteristics were identified in both the simulated and the clinical environment. Experiences of specific skills transfer included ambidexterity, coordination, instrument handling, and visuospatial ability. General transfer experiences were salient in informants' altered training approaches. Informants considered the simulation-based training an entry ticket to perform in the operating room and mentioned supervisor-trainee relationships and opportunities in the workplace as critical conditions of transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings elucidate characteristics of surgical training engagement that can be interpreted as self-regulated learning processes that transcend surgical training environments. Despite appreciating the immediate skills improvements resulting from training, trainees' narratives reflected a struggle to transfer their training to the clinical setting. Tensions existed between perceptions of transferable skills and experiences of transfer within the clinical work environments. These results resonate with research emphasising the importance of the work environment in the transfer process. Our findings provide insights that may inform the development of training programs that support self-regulated learning and transfer of training from the simulated to the clinical environment.

Current Landscape of Surgical Assessment Models in Urology Residency Training.

PURPOSE: Assessing trainees' surgical proficiency is an important aspect of urological surgical training. The current standard is the Urology Milestone Project, initially implemented in 2013. This evaluation is limited in that it contains only 3 questions on surgical competency per surgical modality with assessments occurring semi-annually without real-time operative feedback. However, since the Urology Milestones Project's inception a plethora of competency-based surgical assessment tools have been described. We aim to perform a comprehensive review of the literature of these available tools and analyze their strengths and weaknesses as a way of providing a repository of available assessment strategies for further development of a more comprehensive and standardized assessment tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the primary literature was performed using key words such as "surgical assessment tools urology," "surgical assessment tools prostate," "bladder surgical assessment tools," "renal surgical assessment tools urology," and "surgical assessment tools urology task specific." Technical and nontechnical skill assessments were included. One reviewer identified and analyzed studies that published assessment tools for use in surgical and urological training. RESULTS: A total of 1,497 articles published between 1997-2022 were identified. Of these, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen (52.9%) were specialty nonspecific and 16 (47.1%) were specific for urological training. Of the 18 tools developed for general surgical principles, 12 (66.7%) had some form of validity, 9 (50.0%) were significantly reliable, and 2 (11.1%) were externally validated. Of the 16 tools developed specifically for use in urology training, 13 (81.3%) had some form of validity, 7 (43.8%) were significantly reliable, and none were externally validated. Of these 16 tools, 12 (75.0%) were procedure-specific and 4 (25.0%) were developed for general use in endourological procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical training is evolving toward a competency-based model, as evidenced by the increase in assessment tools created within the past 10 years. These instruments not only provide objective feedback to trainees, but also monitor progression. However, they are heterogeneous in construct and utilization. There remains a need for the adoption of a standardized, valid, and reliable tool, ie, both procedure-specific and generalizable across multiple procedures for use in urology training.

A Call for Change. Can 3D Printing Replace Cadavers for Surgical Training?

While cadaveric dissection has stood the test of time because of its widely accepted educational value by experienced surgeons, the introduction advances in 3D printing and biomaterial technologies could potentially provide alternative tools for surgical training. This novel concept in simulation (physical reality) would encompass all the benefits of cadavers in terms of realism and clinical relevance without any of its ethical, infection, safety, and financial concerns.

The Tomato Model.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous renal access (PCA) is one of the most difficult intervention in endourology. Hands-on training is a useful tool for a good understanding of the puncturing technique, reducing the learning curve, and lowering risks of complications during first procedures. The ideal surgical simulator should efficiently improve trainees' skills, be easily accessible, low-cost, and realistic. We aim to present novel fluoroscopy-guided PCA simulator named TOMATO model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The model can be easily built in few minutes using low-cost items: yoga mat, cotton wool, forceps, needle-driver, scalpel, 0 silk suture, chiba needle, small pebble (1 cm ca) and a few kidney-shaped tomatoes. The yoga mat is fold in half, sutured with silk, placed on the operating table, and thanks to the friction created between the mat and sheet underneath there is no need for other fixating methods. Once placed inside the yoga mat, the tomato is held still in the position by the cotton wool, which is placed around the vegetable. The tomato imitates the real renal structure. Therefore is ideal for this use, and there is no need for liquid-contrast enhancement. The goal is achieved when the operator manages to move the pebble with chiba needle during pulsed fluoroscopy. The model was tested 3 times by 3 endourologists and by 10 residents in training with no experience as first operators. A 7-items questionnaire (1-10 rating scale) was administered to the participants in order to evaluate the utility of the model. Trainees' kidney access time (KAT) and radiation time (RT) were assessed at the first use and after 1 hour of training (circa 15 attempts to reach the target per resident). RESULTS: The model allowed residents' significant reduction of the KAT and RT. KAT passed from 114 (144.25-89) to 72.5 (97.25-49.5) seconds (P = .04) while RAT passed from 82 (89.75-56) to 51.5 (60.25-35.75) seconds (P < .001). The residents particularly appreciated the high-fidelity reproduction of the anatomy that the model offers, and its' usefulness for learning the puncturing technique, giving it 8.5 and 10 points, while the same items were rated 7.7, and 9.3 by the experts, respectively. Trainees felt that their skills could be improved by using this model. The main issue was finding the materials mimicking the real-life tissues and their different characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: TOMATO model might be a helpful and creative way to start learning the steps of kidney puncturing using low-cost materials and we believe its' strength is being easily reproducible in all urology units.

Outcomes of EAU-endorsed Live Surgical Events over a 5-year Period (2015-2020) and Updated Guidelines from the EAU Live Surgery Committee.

CONTEXT: Live surgery events (LSEs) have been used in all surgical fields for education and training and to demonstrate new techniques. The European Association of Urology (EAU) live surgery guidelines were established in 2014. OBJECTIVE: To review the compliance of outcomes for procedures performed at EAU-affiliated LSEs with the 2014 guidelines and to establish updated guidelines for LSEs and semi-LSEs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Patients from EAU-affiliated LSEs were included for all surgical procedures carried out between January 2015 and January 2020. All these events were pre-evaluated by the EAU Live Surgery Committee and met the criteria for an EAU LSE, with outcomes recorded and submitted to the registry. Data were collected for the type of procedure and for intraoperative and short- and long-term complications. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 246 procedures were performed across 18 LSEs, with an annual volume ranging from 19 to 74 procedures. These included 109 (44.3%) robot-assisted procedures, 21 (8.5%) laparoscopic procedures, 10 (4%) transurethral bladder procedures, 11 (4.4%) prostate enucleation procedures, 72 (29.2%) endourological procedures, and 23 (9.3%) andrology or reconstruction procedures. A total of 77 different surgical techniques and variations for 55 different types of surgery were performed as LSEs over the past 5 yr. There were 44 (17.8%) short-term complications and 11.3% (nine/79) long-term complications observed, with Clavien grade III/IV complications seen in 5.2% and 7.5% of cases over short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-yr outcomes for EAU LSEs show that they are safe and follow previous guidelines set by the panel. It seems likely that the fine balance between patient safety and educational value might be best achieved if LSEs are performed by local surgeons in their parent hospital with patients and staff they know, and that technological advances will make live streaming a seamless process. The current EAU Live Surgery Committee has updated the guidelines on LSEs and provided new guidelines for semi-live events. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed 5-year outcomes for live surgery events endorsed by the European Association of Urology. We found that the operations carried out at these events were safe and followed the guidelines previously set. We have updated the guidelines and provided new guidelines for semi-live events.

SIMPLifying Urology Residency Operative Assessments: A Pilot Study in Urology Training.

PURPOSE: The Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) app is an innovative, convenient and validated smartphone-based tool to evaluate residents' operative performance. In this study, we describe the initial implementation of SIMPL in our program's pediatric urology rotation-the first among urology residencies-and provide preliminary data on its adoption by residents and faculty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residents and faculty in our pediatric urology division submitted SIMPL evaluations following surgical cases from August 2019 to July 2020. Evaluations consisted of ratings in 3 domains: resident autonomy, resident operative performance and patient-related case complexity. An online survey was also used to gauge attitudes towards SIMPL, describe patterns of use and solicit feedback on areas for improvement. RESULTS: Eight residents and 6 faculty submitted 141 evaluations, with 76.6% of evaluated cases having both faculty and resident ratings. Verbal feedback was included in 94.2%. Faculty-resident agreement ranged from 68.6% to 75.2% (kappa=0.47 to 0.61). Faculty rated postgraduate year (PGY)-4 residents as more autonomous (p=0.040) and higher performing (p=0.028) than PGY-3 residents. All participants agreed that SIMPL was easy to use and compared favorably to existing avenues of feedback. Barriers to implementation included lack of reminders for evaluations and evaluation fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The SIMPL application improved both frequency and quality of resident operative feedback. Among participants, SIMPL was preferred over the existing feedback system at our institution.

Video-Based Coaching: An Efficient Learning and Teaching Modality for Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology Training Program.

Objective: The development of integrated multimedia operating rooms has made possible to record surgical procedures mainly in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and robotic surgery. This modality of video storage allows the trainees to study surgical procedures based on video analysis. The aim of this study is to compare two learning methods of surgical procedures, operative textbooks and video-based coaching, in a group of 10 pediatric surgery trainees. Patients and Methods: We selected five surgical procedures to study: three MIS procedures, Nissen fundoplication, partial nephrectomy, and cholecystectomy; and two robotic procedures, Lich-Gregoir reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux and Henderson-Hynes pyleoplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ten trainees were divided into two groups of 5 each, Group 1 (G1) and Group 2 (G2). G1 studied the procedures analyzing videos, G2 studied the same procedure classically reading textbooks. Tutors prepared a questionnaire of 100 multianswered questions that was submitted to both groups, divided into 20 questions for each surgical technique. The questionnaire focused on the different steps of surgical techniques. Results: Analyzing the 10 questionnaires, G1 (video group) obtained a median result of 82 exact answers (74-97), whereas G2 (textbook group) obtained a median result of 64.2 correct answers (53-79). Analyzing statistically the results of two groups, using unpaired t-Student's test with a level of statistical significance >95%, the results of G1 were statistically significantly better that G2 with a P = .0265 for the average scores. Conclusion: Video-based coaching to learn surgical techniques is a novel, feasible, and excellent modality for supplementing surgical techniques learning for pediatric surgery trainees. Objective evaluation using a multianswered questionnaire demonstrates that video-based coaching in pediatric surgery is statistically better than textbook classic education. We suggest to adopt this teaching modality in every surgical training program above all to teach MIS and robotic surgery.

Urologic Education in the Era of COVID-19: Results From a Webinar-Based Reconstructive Urology Lecture Series.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response to a virtual educational curriculum in reconstructive urology presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. To assess learner satisfaction with the format and content of the curriculum, including relevance to learners' education and practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A webinar curriculum of fundamental reconstructive urology topics was developed through the Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons and partnering institutions. Expert-led sessions were broadcasted. Registered participants were asked to complete a survey regarding the curriculum. Responses were used to assess the quality of the curriculum format and content, as well as participants' practice demographics. RESULTS: Our survey yielded a response rate of 34%. Survey responses showed >50% of practices offer reconstructive urologic services, with 37% offered by providers without formal fellowship training. A difference in self-reported baseline knowledge was seen amongst junior residents and attendings (P < .05). Regardless of level of training, all participants rated the topics presented as relevant to their education/practice (median response = 5/5). Responders also indicated that the curriculum supplemented their knowledge in reconstructive urology (median response = 5/5). The webinar format and overall satisfaction with the curriculum was highly rated (median response = 5/5). Participants also stated they were likely to recommend the series to others. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate success of an online curriculum in reconstructive urology. Given >50% of practices surveyed offer reconstruction, we believe the curriculum's educational benefits (increasing access and collaboration while minimizing the risk of in-person contact) will continue beyond the COVID-19 pandemic and that this will remain a relevant educational platform for urologists moving forward.

Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize innovations in urologic surgical training in the past 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Many assessment tools have been developed to objectively evaluate surgical skills and provide structured feedback to urologic trainees. A variety of simulation modalities (i.e., virtual/augmented reality, dry-lab, animal, and cadaver) have been utilized to facilitate the acquisition of surgical skills outside the high-stakes operating room environment. Three-dimensional printing has been used to create high-fidelity, immersive dry-lab models at a reasonable cost. Non-technical skills such as teamwork and decision-making have gained more attention. Structured surgical video review has been shown to improve surgical skills not only for trainees but also for qualified surgeons. Research and development in urologic surgical training has been active in the past 5 years. Despite these advances, there is still an unfulfilled need for a standardized surgical training program covering both technical and non-technical skills.

Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology.

PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive review on the new da Vinci SP (single port) robotic surgical system. The published literature to date within urology and a description of the new system will be discussed. FINDINGS: There are currently no high-quality published studies with the SP robotic system. All studies are case series, many with 10 or fewer patients. However, all studies have found the SP system to be safe and feasible in performing most urological procedures. Renal and pelvic surgery using the SP robotic system is safe and feasible in the hands of expert robotic surgeons. Long-term, high-quality data is lacking. While the current high price and the learning curve will limit the SP systems' use in many health care systems, new updates and the release of robotic surgical systems from other developers may help drive down costs and encourage uptake.

Boot camp de simulación en urología: perspectiva de los delegados no británicos / Urology simulation boot camp: A perspective from non-UK delegates

ANTECEDENTES: La simulación médica se ha convertido en una parte integral de la formación quirúrgica moderna. Pero a pesar de sus beneficios, todavía no ha sido ampliamente incorporada en la formación de los residentes. El Boot Camp de Simulación en Urología (BCSU) es un curso innovador de cinco días, dirigido a residentes que entran en el programa de formación del Reino Unido. Desde su implementación ha generado un creciente interés por parte de los residentes no británicos. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la experiencia de los residentes no británicos en el BCSU, tanto cuantitativa como cualitativamente, incluyendo un análisis de la evolución de sus habilidades. Diseño, marco y participantes: Este estudio retrospectivo de doble cohorte incluyó a 20 delegados de países no británicos y 76 residentes del Reino Unido que asistieron al BCSU en 2017 y 2018. Los residentes contestaron preguntas tipo test (PTT) antes y después del curso, cuestionarios de experiencia quirúrgica previos al curso y una encuesta sobre la utilidad de los conocimientos adquiridos, 12 meses después del curso. Medición de resultados y análisis estadístico: Las diferencias en las puntuaciones medias de las PTT entre los delegados del Reino Unido y los no británicos, antes y después del curso, fueron evaluadas con una prueba de T independiente. Cada habilidad de procedimientos de urología básica fue evaluada por un experto y calificada de acuerdo con una escala de Likert (1-5). La prueba de Kruskal-Wallis se utilizó para evaluar las diferencias en las puntuaciones entre ambos grupos en las técnicas de endourología. Se utilizó una escala de Likert (1-5) para calificar las respuestas de los participantes a la encuesta realizada 12 meses después del curso. RESULTADOS Y LIMITACIONES: Los alumnos del Reino Unido obtuvieron una puntuación significativamente más alta en las PTT previas al curso; sin embargo, tras la finalización del entrenamiento, no se observó ninguna diferencia significativa. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en los tiempos de finalización de las e-BLUS (Habilidades básicas en técnicas por laparoscopia en urología), y ambos grupos mejoraron significativamente sus resultados. Una encuesta realizada 12 meses después del curso sobre la utilidad del entrenamiento durante el campamento y la evaluación cualitativa del curso por parte de los delegados extranjeros fue muy positiva. CONCLUSIONES: El BCSU es una experiencia valiosa de aprendizaje que conduce a una mejora de las habilidades técnicas y sociales de los residentes tanto del Reino Unido como de otros países

BACKGROUND: Medical simulation has become an integral part of modern-day surgical training. Despite its benefits, it is still not widely incorporated in the curriculum of trainees. The Urology Boot Camp (USBC) is an innovative 5-day course aimed at trainees entering the UK training scheme. Since its implementation, there's been increasing interest by non-UK trainees. OBJECTIVE: To assess the experiences of non-UK trainees in the USBC, both quantitatively and qualitatively, including skills progression analysis. Design, setting and participants: This double-group cohort retrospective study included 20 delegates from non-UK countries and 76 trainees from UK who attended the USBC in 2017 and 2018. Trainees undertook pre- and post-course MCQs, pre-course operative experience questionnaires and a 12-month post-course survey on the usefulness of the skills acquired. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Differences in mean MCQ scores between UK and non-UK delegates at baseline and after the course were assessed by the independent T-test. Each core urology procedural skill was evaluated by an expert and graded according to a Likert scale (1-5). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the differences in the scores between both groups on endourological techniques. A Likert scale (1-5) was used to grade the participants' answers to the post-course 12-month survey. Results and limitations: Trainees from UK scored significantly higher in the pre-course MCQ assessment, however after completion of the boot camp, no significant difference was noted. There were no differences between the groups at e-BLUS completion times, and both groups significantly improved their results. A 12-month post-course survey on the utility of training during the boot camp and qualitative evaluation of the course by overseas delegates was very positive. CONCLUSIONS: The USBC is a valuable learning experience that leads to improvement of technical and soft skills of UK and non-UK trainees alike

Explorando la perspectiva de los residentes sobre las modalidades y contenidos de aprendizaje inteligente para la educación virtual de urología: lección aprendida durante la pandemia de la COVID-19 / Exploring the Residents' Perspective on Smart learning Modalities and Contents for Virtual Urology Education: Lesson Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJETIVO: La pandemia de la COVID-19 ha alterado sustancialmente las actividades de formación de los residentes. Si bien recientemente se han implementado nuevos programas de aprendizaje virtual, aún debe investigarse su utilidad desde la perspectiva de los aprendices de urología. MÉTODOS: Encuesta online transversal de 30 ítems, distribuida a través de Twitter, entre el 4 y el 18 de abril de 2020, con el objetivo de evaluar la perspectiva de los residentes de urología sobre las modalidades (videos pregrabados, seminarios web, podcasts y redes sociales [RRSS]) y contenidos (lecciones frontales, discusiones de casos clínicos, actualizaciones sobre guías y ensayos clínicos, videos quirúrgicos, clubes de revistas y seminarios sobre liderazgo y habilidades no técnicas) del aprendizaje inteligente (Smart learning). RESULTADOS: En total, 501 residentes de urología de 58 países completaron la encuesta. De estos, 78,4, 78,2, 56,9 y 51,9% consideraron los videos pregrabados, seminarios web interactivos, podcasts y RRSS, respectivamente, como modalidades de aprendizaje inteligente muy útiles. Los contenidos considerados como muy útiles por la mayor proporción de residentes fueron las actualizaciones de guías clínicas (84,8%) y videos quirúrgicos (81,0%). Además, más de la mitad de los residentes consideraron los seminarios de liderazgo y los de habilidades no técnicas (58,9 y 56,5%, respectivamente) como contenidos útiles para el aprendizaje inteligente. Las tres combinaciones preferidas de modalidad y contenido de aprendizaje inteligente fueron: videos quirúrgicos pregrabados, seminarios web interactivos sobre casos clínicos y videos pregrabados sobre guías. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestro estudio proporciona la primera «visión global» de las modalidades y contenidos de aprendizaje inteligente que deben priorizarse con el objetivo de optimizar la educación virtual en urología. Aunque este estudio se llevó a cabo durante la pandemia de la COVID-19, nuestros hallazgos podrían tener un impacto aún mayor en el futuro

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 outbreak has substantially altered residents' training activities. While several new virtual learning programs have been recently implemented, the perspective of urology trainees regarding their usefulness still needs to be investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional, 30-item, web-based Survey was conducted through Twitter from April 4th, 2020 to April 18th, 2020, aiming to evaluate the urology residents' perspective on smart learning (SL) modalities (pre-recorded videos, webinars, podcasts, and social media [SoMe]), and contents (frontal lessons, clinical case discussions, updates on Guidelines and on clinical trials, surgical videos, Journal Clubs, and seminars on leadership and non-technical skills). RESULTS: Overall, 501 urology residents from 58 countries completed the survey. Of these, 78.4, 78.2, 56.9 and 51.9% of them considered pre-recorded videos, interactive webinars, podcasts and SoMe highly useful modalities of smart learning, respectively. The contents considered as highly useful by the greatest proportion of residents were updates on guidelines (84.8%) and surgical videos (81.0%). In addition, 58.9 and 56.5% of responders deemed seminars on leadership and on non-technical skills highly useful smart learning contents. The three preferred combinations of smart learning modality and content were: pre-recorded surgical videos, interactive webinars on clinical cases, and pre-recorded videos on guidelines. CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first global «big picture» of the smart learning modalities and contents that should be prioritized to optimize virtual Urology education. While this survey was conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak, our findings might have even more impact in the future

Validation of a Bench-Top Training Model for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the in-house built Styrofoam box bench-top training model for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed in the setting of a half-day RIRS course. During the course, participants performed RIRS on a locally built bench-top model. We recruited 26 participants, comprising 20 trainees and 6 experts. Trainees and experts were asked to fill a self-administered questionnaire assessing various components of RIRS to assess the face and content validity. For construct validity, experts using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) rated trainees and the mean OSATS score of junior versus senior residents was compared. RESULTS: As per trainees, the model was 86% (4.3/5) realistic, which was backed by experts who found this model to be 87.6% (4.38/5) realistic. The overall face validity of the model was 86.4% (4.32/5). The overall content validity of this model was 83.4% (4.17/5). Majority of the participants thought that this tool is useful for learning technique (4.38 ± 0.49) and safe-conduct (4.31 ± 0.73) of the procedure. The trainees concurred that the skills acquired are transferable to the operating room (4.23 ± 0.76). However, the construct validity by comparing mean OSATS score of junior versus senior residents was 19.5 ± 3.5 and 23 ± 4.5. A p value of 0.11 could not be established. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated the face, content, and construct validity of the bench-top training model for RIRS. Further evaluation is necessary to compare its effectiveness against other available models to demonstrate concurrent validity.

Endoscopic surgical simulation using low-fidelity and virtual reality transurethral resection simulators in urology simulation boot camp course: trainees feedback assessment study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to study trainees' feedback and rating of models for training transurethral resection of bladder lesions (TURBT) and prostate (TURP) during simulation. METHODS: The study was performed during the ''Transurethral resection (TUR) module" at the boot camp held in 2019. Prior to the course, all trainees were required to evaluate their experience in performing TURBT and TURP procedures. Trainees simulated resection on two different models; low-fidelity tissue model (Samed, GmBH, Dresden, Germany) and virtual reality simulator (TURPMentor, 3D Systems, Littleton, US). Following the completion of the module, trainees completed a questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate their assessment of the models for surgical training. RESULTS: In total, 174 simulation assessments were performed by 56 trainees (Samed Bladder-40, Prostate-45, TURPMentor Bladder-51, Prostate-37). All trainees reported that they had performed < 50 TUR procedures. The Samed model median scores were for appearance (4/5), texture (5/5), feel (5/5) and conductibility (5/5). The TURPMentor median score was for appearance (4/5), texture and feel (4/5) and conductibility (4/5). The most common criticism of the Samed model was that it failed to mimic bleeding. In contrast, trainees felt that the TURPMentor haptic feedback was inadequate to allow for close resection and did not calibrate movements accurately. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that both forms of simulators (low-fidelity and virtual reality) were rated highly by urology trainees and improve their confidence in performing transurethral resection and in fact complement each other in providing lower tract endoscopic resection simulation.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel High-Value Care Curriculum in a Single Academic Surgery Department.

BACKGROUND: High value care (HVC), maximizing quality while minimizing cost, has become a major focus of surgical practice. Effective education in healthcare value concepts is critical during residency to ensure graduates are able to deliver high value surgical care and participate in interprofessional teams to improve the system. STUDY DESIGN: An HVC curriculum was implemented at a single academic medical center. Sixty-six residents from general surgery, plastic surgery, otolaryngology, and urology completed the curriculum over 3 academic years (2016 to 2019). The 1-year curriculum taught residents the concepts of HVC before participating in a value improvement project the following year. Residents' knowledge of value was assessed pre- and post-participation using a validated assessment tool, the Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool Revised (QIKAT-R), and a curriculum-specific assessment tool. The overall success of the program was evaluated by assessing residents' skills in completing value improvement projects using a novel scoring rubric. RESULTS: After completing the program, residents expressed improved confidence in their ability to complete a value improvement project. Residents also demonstrated improved knowledge on the curriculum-specific assessment (4.7/13 to 10.9/13) and the scenario assessment using the QIKAT-R tool (8.5/27 to 16.4/27). As the program underwent iterative improvements each year, the quality of the residents' projects also improved, as assessed by the novel scoring rubric. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal assessment demonstrated improvement in residents' objective knowledge of HVC principles, residents' ability to design and lead clinical value improvement projects, and residents' confidence they could use HVC principles in their current and future practice.

Quality improvement education in surgical specialty training: A comparison of Vascular Surgery resident and Urology Resident experiences and attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Academic institutions have increasingly focused on educating physicians and surgeons in concepts of value-based care, including quality improvement (QI). The extent to which QI curricular competencies are addressed in specialty surgical residency training is unclear. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed by content experts and sent to Vascular Surgery and Urology residents electronically. Descriptive statistics and bivariate associations were calculated using StataMP 13.1. RESULTS: Vascular Surgery and Urology residents reported exposure to similar types of QI curriculum. Fewer than half of residents reported achieving targets for graduation (Vascular 31%, Urology 42%) related to QI, and few residents in either group felt very well-prepared to lead a QI initiative (Vascular 13%, Urology 8%). CONCLUSION: QI education in surgical specialty training amongst Vascular Surgery and Urology residencies is similar and insufficient. Surgical specialties may benefit from collaborative efforts to improve the quality of QI education.

Urology simulation boot camp: A perspective from non-UK delegates. / Boot camp de simulación en urología: perspectiva de los delegados no británicos.

BACKGROUND: Medical simulation has become an integral part of modern-day surgical training. Despite its benefits, it is still not widely incorporated in the curriculum of trainees. The Urology Boot Camp (USBC) is an innovative 5-day course aimed at trainees entering the UK training scheme. Since its implementation, there's been increasing interest by non-UK trainees. OBJECTIVE: To assess the experiences of non-UK trainees in the USBC, both quantitatively and qualitatively, including skills progression analysis. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-group cohort retrospective study included 20 delegates from non-UK countries and 76 trainees from UK who attended the USBC in 2017 and 2018. Trainees undertook pre- and post-course MCQs, pre-course operative experience questionnaires and a 12-month post-course survey on the usefulness of the skills acquired. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Differences in mean MCQ scores between UK and non-UK delegates at baseline and after the course were assessed by the independent T-test. Each core urology procedural skill was evaluated by an expert and graded according to a Likert scale (1-5). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the differences in the scores between both groups on endourological techniques. A Likert scale (1-5) was used to grade the participants' answers to the post-course 12-month survey. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Trainees from UK scored significantly higher in the pre-course MCQ assessment, however after completion of the boot camp, no significant difference was noted. There were no differences between the groups at e-BLUS completion times, and both groups significantly improved their results. A 12-month post-course survey on the utility of training during the boot camp and qualitative evaluation of the course by overseas delegates was very positive. CONCLUSIONS: The USBC is a valuable learning experience that leads to improvement of technical and soft skills of UK and non-UK trainees alike.